Pues veras Vago, la verdad es que Liria tiene un trauma psicológico porque de seguro los aliens le metieron una sonda anal de pequeña, por ello parece detestar cualquier cosa que hable de algo alienígena.
Yo diría que la mayor parte de los casos reales están basados en películas. Casos como el de la abducción de los Hill no habrían sido posibles sin series de TV.
La cantidad de EC superan por mucho a cualquier serie o película. Además, las películas no existían en la antigüedad y sin embargo:
Según tu retorcida lógica las patadas voladoras tampoco existen porque Bruce Lee las hacía en películas...
Otras de las estrategias de los conspiradores es justamente la "ficcionalización" de realidades no convenientes para sacarlas de aquello tangible. Y luego dices que no le tomas la leche al gato...
Si es verdad, no dijiste cientos, dijiste múltiples y muchos que para tí media docena los son. Pero lo siento, el fenómeno como tu le llamas nunca se fotografió y menos en 1952.
Diagram of the UFOs tracked by Washington's National Airport radar scope on July 20, 1952. At A, 7 objects approach the Nation's capital from the south. At B, some are seen over the White House and Capitol. At C, they appear over Andrews Air Force Base. At D, one UFO tracks an airliner. At E, one is seen to make a sharp right-angular turn. Source: UFOs - A Pictorial History From Antiquity to the Present, by David C. Knight. (McGraw Hill Book Co., 1979.) Opa, están fotografiados en radar y todo!
Si te molestaras en leer lo que dicen los enlaces que pongo hubieras encontrado que evidentemente suprimieron la entrada que hablaba del caso:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... Jul19.html Dime, puedes entrar?
No, tu eres quien dice que lo pretenden ocultar cuando hablas de que montan una megaconspiración para ocultarlo.
Al contrario, no solo se fotografió en 1952, sino en otras fechas donde sucedió el mismo fenómeno y en el mismo lugar.
Encima posteas tres enlaces cutres que no valen para nada, uno de ellos a un video donde sale un dibujo del Gazzette prueba de que de haber fotografía la habría publicado. Luego aparece un video que se demostro que se hizo moviendo un cristal delante de la cámara, otra foto que salen los reflejos de los faros de los automoviles y luego la del Concorde que ya sabe todo el mundo que era una mancha en la lente de la cámara movil que filmaba.
Una explicación más estúpida que la otra. Lo dice la señorita que cree que los gansos son fluoroscentes! Y lo del Concorde NINGUN mundo sabe que fuera una simple mancha (tal vez en tu mundo mágico debunker rosa). De hecho, te han puesto fotograma por fotograma y en otro post demostraron contundentemente que es un objeto independiente a la cámara moviéndose delante del Concorde, ergo demostraron que mientes.
Cutre total, pero del periodico nada y encima tienes la desfachatez de decir que han suprimido el enlace.
Ya te lo mencioné innumerable veces y sigues sin entenderlo, por lo que concluyo que eres una mega-idiota. La conspiración existe para tergiversar aquello evidente, lo único que ocultan son los documentos más importantes que ellos tienen en cuanto al tema y la evidencia que ellos mismos recolectaron muchas veces intimidando y arrebatádosela a testigos civiles.
Por lo tanto no podrían tejer una conspiración para ocultarlos si fuesen extraterrestres, ya que como no obedecen a voluntades de gobiernos pueden aparecer en cualquier sitio y poner en una estacada a cualquier gobierno. Luego sería absurdo siquiera intentarlo si fueran de otros mundos y por ende sería absurdo lo de la megaconspiración del ocultamiento.
Sin embargo existen megaidiotas que, pagos o no, se engargan de echar m*erda sobre toda la fenomenología para mantener el statu quo del establishment.
Pero no te lo digo yo, te lo dice el mismísimo DR J.A. Hynek, del cual te vuelvo a poner el video, ya que parece que tu cerebro tiene poca capacidad de absorción:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=857jSuSJiX0[/youtube]1- Que los que confían en el gobierno y las fuerzas armadas les den la razón y piensen en "inversiones térmicas"
2- Que analicen un poco y no les crean para pensar que tratan de ocultar visitas extraterrestres.
En ambos casos evitan que piensen en escuadrones de aeronaves secretas financiadas sabe Dios de que manera.
Ufff... super lógico, muestran naves secretas alrededor de todo el globo, y encima se autopersiguen. Además aterrizan disfrazados de humanoides. Super lógico... También usan entre sus excusas la de prototipos propios, para no alarmar a la población y que piensen que tienen el control y sin embargo tu piensas que hacen lo contrario... muy lógico...
http://mpfiles.com.ar/ovni/hmp-refuted.htmPuede que algunos OVNIs sean aviones de ellos, no me importa. Hay algunos que no lo son, y eso sí importa. Deberías darte cuenta de las relevancias y prioridades que realmente importan para nuestra especie.
Además si lees la nota del periódico del cual posteaste la imagen verás que dice:
July 28, 1952
"Saucer" outran jet, pilot revealsInvestigation on in secret after chase over capitalRadar spot blips like aircraft for nearly six hours - only 1.700 feet up
By Paul Sampson, Post Reporter
Military secrecy veils an investigation of the mysterious, glowing aerial objects that showed up on radar screens in the Washington area Saturday night for the second consecutive week.
A jet pilot sent up by the Air Defense Command to investigate the objects reported he was unable to overtake the glowing lights moving near Andrews Air Force Base.
The CAA reported reported the objects traveled at "predominantly lower levels"-about 1700 feet. July 19.
Air Force spokesmen said yesterday only that an investigation was being made into the sighting of the objects on the radar screen in the CAA Air Route Traffic Control Center at Washington National Airport, and on two other radar screens . Methods of the investigations were classified as secret, a spoken said.
"We have no evidence they are flying saucers; conversely we have no evidence they are not flying saucers. We don't know what they are," a spokesman added.
The same source reported an expert from the Air Technical Intelligence Center at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton Ohio, was here last week investigating the objects sighted July 19.
The expert has been identified as Capt. E. J. Ruppelt. Reached by telephone at his home in Dayton yesterday, Ruppelt said he could make no comment on his activity in Washington.
Capt. Ruppelt confirmed he was in Washington last week but said he had not come here to investigate the mysterious objects. He recalled he did make an investigation after hearing of the objects, but could not say what he investigated.
Another Air Force spokesman said here yesterday the Air Force is taking all steps necessary to evaluate the sightings. "The intelligence people," this spokesman explained, "sent someone over to the control center at the time of the sightings and did whatever necessary to make the proper evaluation.
Asked whether the radar equipment might have been mis-functioning, the spokesman said, "radar, like the compass is not a perfect instrument and is subject to error." He thought, however, the investigation would be made by persons acquainted with the problems of radar.
Two other radar screens in the area picked up the objects.An employee of the National Airport control tower said the radar scope there picked up very weak "blips" of the objects. The tower radar's for "short range" and is not so powerful as that at the center. Radar at Andrews Air Force Base also registered the objects from about seven miles south of the base.
A traffic control center spokesman said the nature of the signals on the radar screen ruled out any possibility they were from clouds or any other "weather" disturbance.
"The returns we received from the unidentified objects were similar and analagous to targets representing aircraft in flight," he said.
The objects, "flying saucer or what have you, appeared on the radar scope at the airport center at 9:08 PM. Varying from 4 to 12 in number,the objects appeared on the screen until 3:00 AM., when they diappeared.
At 11:25 PM., two F-94 jet fighters fro Air Defense Command squadron, at New CAstle Delaware, capable of 600 hundred mph speeds, took off to investigate the objects.
Airline, civil and military pilots described the objects as looking like the lit end of a cigarette or a cluster of orange and red lights.
One jet pilot observed 4 lights in the vicinity of Andrews Air Force Base, but was not able to over-take them, and they disappeared in about two minutes.
The same pilot observed a steady white light in the vicinity of Mt Vernon at 11:49 PM. The light, about 5 miles from him, faded in a minute. The lights were also observed in the Beltsville, MD., vicinity. At 1:40 AM two-other F-94 jet fighters took off and scanned the area until 2:20 AM., but did not make any sightings.
Visible two daysAlthough "unidentified objects" have been picked up on radar before, the incidents of the last two saturdays are believed to be the first time the objects have been picked up on radar-while visible to the human eye.
Besides the pilots, who last saturday saw the lights, a woman living on Mississippi Ave., told the Post she saw a very "bright light streaking across the sky towards Andrews Air Force Base about 11:45 PM. Then a second object with a tail like a comet whizzed by, and a few seconds later, a third passed in a different direction toward Suntland, she said.
Radar operators plotted the speed of "saturday night's visitors" at from 38 to 90 mph, but one jet pilot reported faster speeds for the light he saw.
The jet pilot reported he had no apparent "closing speed" when he attempted to reach the lights he saw near Andrews Air Force Base. That means the lights were moving atleast as fast as his top speed-a maximum of 600 mph.
One person who saw the lights when they first appeared in this area did not see them last night. He is E.W. Chambers, an engineer at Radio Station WRC, who spotted the lights while working early the morning of July 20 at station's Hyattsville tower.
Chamber's said he was sorry he had seen the lights because he had been skeptical about "flying saucers" before. Now he said, he sort of "wonders" and worrys about the whole thing.
Leon Davidson, 804 South Irving St. Arlington, a chemical engineer who made an exhaustive study of "flying saucers" as a hobby, said yesterday reports of saucers in the East, have been relatively rare.
Davidson has studied the official report on the saucers, including some of the secret portions never made public, and analyzed all the data in the report.
Davidson, whose study of saucers is impressively detailed and scientific, said he believes the lights are American "aviation products"-probably "circular flying wings," using new type jet engines that permit rapid acceleration and relatively low speeds. He believes, they are either "new fighter," guided missiles, or piloted guided missiles.
He cited some of the recent jet fighters, including the Navy's new "F-4-D, which has a radical "bat-wing," as examples of what the objects might resemble.
Davidson thinks the fact that the lights have been seen in this area indicates the authorities may be ready to disclose the "new aircraft" in the near future. Previously, most of the "verified saucers" have been seen over sparsely inhabited areas, Davidson explained, and now, when they appear here, it may indicate that "secrecy" is not so important any more. Ahora, cómo era es que querían ocultar sus prototipos secretos haciendo pensar que eran ETs???
Aquí tienes una lista de recortes periodísticos de dicha fecha (THE DAILY PRESS):
http://www.ufologie.net/htm/usa1952.htmUn inciso, nunca he dicho que la foto no exista, simplemente afirmo que es de 1965. El resto lo aportas tu.
En todo caso, el de 1965 también son OVNIs. Por lo que es algo que suma al de 1952, no resta como quieres hacer ver.
Te pasas la vida desinformando (tonto util que ni siquiera lo sabe) cuando caes en la trampa que tienden los que se hacen de oro en USA, pareces yanqui.
Wow, ahora también eres xenófoba, eres pariente de Chavez? Por cierto, en tu argumento no has negado que eres una conspiradora que usa los mismos ardides que la CIA, interesante. No entiendo cómo los millones de testigos OVNI alrededor de todo el mundo se puedan hacer con oro. Debo recordarte que es un fenómeno a nivel global?
Que fuerte!!Que fuerte!!Que fuerte!! No si me vas a decir ahora que tu comprendes una supuesta tecnología alienigena y que por eso ves los campos magneticos.
Obviamente, se llama pensamiento científico. Da Vinci no se pasaba horas observando los fenómenos de la naturaleza sin comprender en cierta medida las leyes físicas que los hacían funcionar. Si tuvieras algo de este tipo de pensamiento te darías cuenta que la imaginación juega un papel muy importante en el camino a comprender nuestra realidad.
"La imaginación es más importante que el conocimiento." —Albert Einstein.